Developed by Allan Drexler, David Sibbet, and Russ Forrester, this model comprises seven stages to help optimize the workflow of a team effort: orientation , trust. Allan Drexler and David Sibbet spent nine years refining a comprehensive model of team The Drexler/Sibbet Team Performance™ model illustrates team. We have made use of this model for over 25 years. It’s the most comprehensive team model out there. The model uses simple and direct.

Author: Arashura Mezill
Country: Papua New Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 19 December 2006
Pages: 380
PDF File Size: 1.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.76 Mb
ISBN: 362-8-86432-154-2
Downloads: 75812
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Ninris

There are a variety of models that have been designed to help manage teams and plan projects.

The Drexler Sibbet Team Performance Model

Both models present logical approaches to getting the most out of your work with a team. Often the goal of a leader is to gather the working parts of an organization, team, or project to form a cohesive unit and achieve a common goal.

This chapter will characterize the stages of each model and explain how the two prescribed models can help tram the workflow of a team effort. Developed by Allan Drexler, David Sibbet, and Russ Forrester, this model comprises seven stages to help optimize the workflow of a team effort: Each stage is identified by the primary question of concern for team members when they are in that phase. The structure of the model resembles the path of a bouncing ball.


When in the stages toward the top of the diagram the beginning and endteams will often dfexler-sibbet a greater sense of freedom — the orientation and renewal stages provide opportunities for limitless potential and possibility. As a team moves into stages toward the bottom of the diagram the middle stagesthere are more constraints. Goals are set, and some things end up being included, while others do not.

Drexler/Sibbet Team Performance model – Agile Coffee

The model is designed to enhance workflow and team performance rather than restrict the team to a fixed set of rules. When team members are unable to envision a role for themselves, they often feel drexler-sibet and distance themselves from the group. Goal Clarification Here is where the team works to identify a shared vision by discussing possibilities, variations, and the reasons these goals may or may not be the best options.

Some disagreement can happen during this stage, so it is important to make sure that everyone is on the same page before proceeding. This is also a good time to address any conflict between individual and organizational goals. Commitment This stage comprises the deexler-sibbet constraining work the team will face during the entire process.

If your work here remains unresolved, some team members may disown individual responsibility for the success of the team by going along with the preferences of others, while others may attack proposed courses of action without offering any feasible alternatives. Such behavior could indicate a lack of priorities, roles, or a clear definition of how work should proceed.


The Drexler Sibbet Team Performance Model – McNeil Consulting

Implementation The implementation stage is dominated by timing and scheduling. You may cycle back through earlier stages of the process as your team encounters unforeseen obstacles and works to find its groove.

This can be achieved with online project management tools, flowcharts, or work plans. Another tool that may prove helpful in planning projects is GRPI — an acronym for goals, roles, process, and interpersonal relationships.

Drexler/Sibbet Team Performance model

The GRPI model suggests that teams and their leaders will function most effectively if they address the four stages of planning in the order they are listed in the acronym, as follows: R oles — Who will do what on the team? Are the roles performancs responsibilities clear? Leading a Nonprofit Organization.

The GRPI model is a simple but effective way to plan projects. G oals — What is the team going to accomplish? What is its core mission? I nterpersonal relationships — How do the team members get along?

You need Adobe Flash Player to view some content on this site.