So our final judgment on "what’s wrong" with Huxley’s brave .. Excerpted from OUR POSTHUMAN FUTURE by Francis Fukuyama. Francis Fukuyama’s Our Posthuman Future fears that biotechnology will make monsters of us. Steven Rose weighs the evidence. The power to genetically enhance future generations could be a boon for humanity – or it could lead to an era of violent rebellion against the.
|Published (Last):||20 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Of the nightmares evoked by these two books, Brave New World”s always struck me as more subtle and more challenging.
He is on less firm ground when dealing with genetic claims, where he accepts at face value the rather suspect evidence for postthuman “smart” or “aggressive” mice engineered by adding or removing DNA from their genomes. I have to say that I hae used this book for both of my majors in more than three classes and it explains thins very well. The second point he made, which was even worse of an oopsie, is when the author talked about how a ish future full of government surveillance of its citizens as a fact of life is very unlikely.
The book also sports a twelve page bibliography however, in this college textbook-like work there is no index, where surely one is needed. Critics point out that human nature can be expressed only within the diverse and historically contingent societies that humans create, and therefore cannot be understood a priori.
To be fair, even though this book is written from an entirely secular perspective, he also examined the franciis conclusions that follow when one begins with a teleological perspective on life.
The book’s pages plus notes and bibliographyand fighting fit. Sound conclusion, faulty premises.
Don’t mess with human nature…
His claim is that a substantive human nature exists, that basic ethical principles and political rights such as equality are based on judgments about that nature, and therefore that human dignity itself could be lost if human nature is altered. He takes some rather interesting and controversial positions, but they are well thought out and supported with hard facts and straight forward logic.
My library Help Advanced Book Search. Only slightly more soberly, psychopharmacologists offer the prospect of tailor-made drugs to ease the mental pain of living, enhance intelligence, and control disruptive behaviour.
Francis Fukuyama was born in the Hyde Park neighborhood of Chicago. Societies are growing older, individuals live longer, drugs like Prozac and Ritalin make sure individual outliers are driven more to society’s medians, and changes like these will have a profound long term political effect.
There is even a government ministry to ensure that the length of time between the powthuman of a desire and its satisfaction is kept to a minimum. The Origins of Political Order: By this I mean not just fighting metaphorically, in the sense of shouting matches among talking heads on TV and debates in Congress, but actually picking up guns and bombs and using them on other people.
He has written a number of other books, among them Trust: He is right to argue that, contrary to what some people think, or would have us think, regulation does work to a large extent. What might be the consequences of the biotechnology revolution?
Farrar, Straus and Giroux. If people get upset enough about genetic inequality, there will be two courses of action.
Speaking of the superscript text-noted endnotes, this book has twenty-one pages of them. And how do we regulate the advance of science? The third school says human rights are whatever a political body says they are. But this book is so basic, it is almost pseudo-academic. Other editions – View all Our Posthuman Future: People were again quick to point out that these two events–the collapse of totalitarian empires and the emergence of the personal computer, as well as other forms of inexpensive information technology, from TVs and radios to faxes and e-mail–were not unrelated.
For one can then ask, What is so important about being a human being in the traditional way that Huxley defines it? Ultimately, he argues for strong international regulation of human biotechnology and thoughtfully disposes of the most compelling counterarguments. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. In fact, it was the very non-existence of govt spying on its citizens that led him to steer the book away from that subject and more into biotech areas.
Please try again later. Indeed, this is one of the few things in a politics of the future that people are likely to rouse themselves to fight over.
Our Posthuman Future by Francis Fukuyama (II) | Books | The Guardian
Those words we all intoned in grade school about all “men” being “endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” that was Fukuymaa, in the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence, making an essentially parallel argument.
The francos thing, well, if anyone wants to call me on that then I’ll explain myself further maybe, I’m awfully lazy. And he is right that prohibition of certain types of research, such human cloning, should be the starting point and litmus test. The book spends rather a long time trying to determine what is the core human essence that we fkuyama be careful to not disrupt with our technologies.
This is the world of classical tyranny, technologically empowered but not so different from what we have tragically seen and known in human history. This was the section I found the most interesting because it illustrated the type of hoops you have to jump through to make an egalitarian case for the intrinsic value of all human life when you start with the presumption of philosophical naturalism.